Part 5: Attributes Synthesis

To conclude our EIC exploration, we now integrate Interstitial Anatomy and Physiology. We should remember that the journey between Attributes Proliferation to Attributes Synthesis is just a conceptual one. We are constructing a roadmap to illustrate, step by step, aspects of complex system behavior. Therefore, Attributes Synthesis is not an endpoint or final goal—it represents the outermost layer of interstitiality, constructed upon all previous layers. Let’s refresh the Attributes Synthesis definition and introducing its components:...

Let’s examine how this integration is represented. Organic and instrumental synthesis share more similarities with each other than with mixed synthesis, and they are also simpler in structure. Therefore, we’ll review them together. Remember that the complete interstitial anatomy set has this symbolic form: Interstitial Anatomy: {iD ≡ iO ≡ iR ≡ iE} We can combine this set with any of the physiology types, and we could use different types of operators to do so....

What we just discussed regarding organic and instrumental synthesis also applies to mixed synthesis. Our main issue is how we handle the joined presence of both interstitial longings. Remember that each longing predisposes the opposite pole of their parallel attribute pair (e.g. functionality predispose imperdurability). So, a mixed state that presents both longings simultaneously reflects an interstitial potential—one awaiting a dominant longing to take charge. We’ll call this potential state the raw form of mixed synthesis:...

Our attachment to perdurability ties to human mortality, life meaning and identity legacy. We seek systems that perdure to compensate for our finite and absurd existence. If we are replaced we feel without meaning—if we are forgotten our legacy is empty. While our intellect may understand the brevity of the insect and the species extinction, it can’t let go of our ephemeral presence in this reality. The small and the large may perish, yet I must endure....

First, we need to bridge unification and conciliation synthesis to concepts that would be familiar to us. This is easy enough because each interstitial form of mixed synthesis has an intrinsic attributes’ correlation. We’ll call this relationship Status Reciprocity: Unification leads to Centralization. Conciliation leads to Decentralization. We briefly mention these concepts on the “Attribute Position” section, when we described interstitial and intrinsic attributes: Trajectory of Attributes Dynamics ATTRIBUTE POSITION (Beginning) ATTRIBUTE DISPOSITION (End) Intrinsic Attributes Centralization / Decentralization Interstitial Attributes Unification / Conciliation Now we are indeed at the end of our trajectory....

Introduction to Conciliatorics laid the foundation for this framework. We began by outlining a basic premise: that systems are shaped not only by their internal qualities but also by the ways we construct, intervene, and organize around them. These dynamics can be mapped, questioned, and reoriented. The core objective was not to finalize a theory, but to open a practical pathway for thinking about complex systems in a more deliberate way....